Niger: Is the struggle against acute malnutrition in Niger gaining ground?
In 2006, MSF obtained good results from using Plumpy’nut to treat all children suffering from acute malnutrition, whether severe or moderate. However, while mobilisation against malnutrition has made progress in Niger, the response remains unsatisfactory. In 2007, we will be testing a new strategy involving the distribution, during the “hunger gap,” of a nutritional product adapted to the needs of all children under 3 years of age. Isabelle Defourny, Deputy Program Manager, explains. How is the food situation in Niger evolving? So, contrary to what may be suggested by the preliminary results of a national survey carried out by the Niger Government, UNICEF and the World Food Program (WFP), I do not think that one can speak in terms of a “clear improvement.” On the other hand, it is true that the various parties involved have become increasingly mobilised over the malnutrition issue. For the first time in many years, children suffering from acute malnutrition have been able to access treatment centres. However, we still have serious doubts about the impact of these interventions at the national level. Is the treatment of children suffering from acute malnutrition satisfactory?Today, children who have severe acute malnutrition are treated with ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) such as Plumpy’nut. However, except in the MSF program, those suffering from moderate acute malnutrition are treated with enriched flour, which is significantly less effective. Yet it is precisely within this group that the largest number of deaths occurs. In 2006, MSF treated cases of moderate and severe acute malnutrition in the same way, using RUTF. Children who presented no medical complications were treated in our outpatient program, with a weekly monitoring visit. Only the more serious cases were hospitalised in our feeding centres. This experience shows that utilising ready-to-use therapeutic products enables moderate acute malnutrition to be treated effectively and the number of severe cases to be reduced. For the first time in six years, in the district where we work, we did not see a peak in severe malnutrition during the “hunger gap.” On the contrary, severe malnutrition decreased throughout the year. Up to now, no other aid participant has been able to show similar results. What is MSF’s 2007 operational strategy in Niger? Using these means, we enable mothers to provide their children with proper food, adapted to their specific nutritional requirements. We have already seen, in 2005 and 2006, that giving mothers the responsibility for treating uncomplicated acute malnutrition produces good results. It is only when a child is ill or severely malnourished that treatment takes place in medical facilities. In tandem with this distribution, and in cooperation with the Ministry of Health, we carry out consultations for all sick children in five district health centres, and have an outpatient program for the treatment of severe malnutrition. These consultations will enable us to monitor the evolution of the food situation and to identify children who need to be hospitalised, either in government hospitals or - for malnourished children presenting severe medical complications - in MSF’s own facilities.What is the outlook for this type of program?
In a second phase, we hope that WFP and the government will take over the distribution. In that respect, two problems remain. Firstly, these actors involved in treating malnutrition must demonstrate their political will. Secondly, the cost of the ready-to-use food product is still too high, between two and three euros per kilo. We are exploring a number of avenues for reducing the cost of Plumpy’doz, particularly having it produced locally…
Read other articles on the Nutrition Crisis in Niger Read other articles on malnutrition
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||